home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1995
/
TIME Almanac 1995.iso
/
time
/
world
/
b
/
burma.2a
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1993-04-15
|
10KB
|
198 lines
<text id=93CT1627>
<link 90TT3071>
<link 90TT1568>
<link 90TT1491>
<link 89TT2165>
<title>
Burma (Myanmar)--History
</title>
<history>
Compact ALMANAC--CIA Factbook
Southeast Asia
Burma
</history>
<article>
<source>CIA World Factbook</source>
<hdr>
History
</hdr>
<body>
<p> First unified during the 11th century by King Anawrahta,
Burma remained independent until 1287, when Kublai Khan's Mongol
hordes invaded the country and destroyed the political order.
A second dynasty was established in 1486 but was plagued by
internal disunity, compounded since the mid-16th century by
intermittent wars with Siam (now Thailand). A new dynasty was
established in 1752, and the country was reunited under King
Alaungpaya. Under the rule of Alaungpaya and his successor Burma
repelled Chinese invasion and confronted the British, who were
vying with the French for dominance in the area.
</p>
<p> Burma was annexed to British India during the three
Anglo-Burmese wars between 1824 and 1886. Thibaw, the last king,
was exiled by the British, and the entire monarchical system was
destroyed. During the colonial era, a large influx of Indians
and Chinese, along with the British, came to control much of the
country's economy. Burma was separated from India in 1937 and
granted a constitution providing a limited measure of
self-government. Until independence, the country's ethnic
minorities were administered under a separate system.
</p>
<p> During World War II, the Japanese occupied Burma and granted
a fictitious independence under a puppet regime led by
anti-British nationalists, who later turned against the Japanese
and aided the Allied forces in retaking the country. A coalition
of nationalist forces, the Anti-Fascist People's Freedom League
(AFPFL), emerged as the principal political organization
following the Japanese defeat in 1945 and the restoration of
British authority. Under AFPFL leadership. various groups and
regions within British Burma eventually joined to form the Union
of Burma, which on January 4, 1948, became a fully independent
nation outside the Commonwealth.
</p>
<p> During the first decade of independence, the Burmese
Government was controlled by the AFPFL, headed by Prime Minister
U Nu, who had become president of that organization following
the assassination in 1947 of Burma's great wartime and postwar
hero, Gen. Aung San. The new government carried on the tradition
of parliamentary democracy inherited from the British and was
dedicated to the creation of a socialist welfare state.
</p>
<p> During the early years of independence, the government
vigorously consolidated its power and held the union together
in the face of revolts by communists and other dissident groups
as well as separatist movements among ethnic minorities. In
1958, the AFPFL split, precipitating a political crisis that led
to an army takeover in September of that year led by the Chief
of Staff, Gen. U Ne Win. Preserving constitutional forms, Gen.
U Ne Win, acting as prime minister, set up a "caretaker"
government with the limited objective of restoring order and
stability necessary for new elections. U Nu and his faction of
the AFPFL, renamed the Union Party, won an overwhelming majority
in the 1960 elections.
</p>
<p> Despite popular backing, the U Nu government proved
ineffective and indecisive in coping with growing problems of
internal security, national unity, and economic development.
Difficulties were compounded by factional disputes within the
Union Party similar to those that split the AFPFL in 1958. U
Nu's decision to move toward a federal system to placate
minorities provoked fear among some that AFPFL would be
destroyed. Gen. U Ne Win again deposed the AFPFL government in
a March 1962 coup, suspended the constitution, and established
a new revolutionary government.
</p>
<p> On March 2 1974, a constitutionally elected, single-party
government was installed. Gen. U Ne Win assumed the presidency
with the same basic group of military officers in control.
Requirements that military officers in civilian positions resign
reduced the military appearance of the government structure.
However, candidates for top positions were recruited frequently
from the military, which continued to play a key role in Burma's
power structure.
</p>
<p> U Ne Win retired in November 1981, upon election of his
successor by the Council of State. Nevertheless, as Chairman of
the Central Executive Committee of the Burma Socialist Programme
Party (BSPP), he continued to influence Burma's politics.
</p>
<p> At an extraordinary congress of the BSPP in July 1988, U Ne
Win resigned as party chairman, citing personal responsibility
for the economic conditions that had led to a series of violent
riots in Rangoon the previous March and June. U Sein Lwin, a Ne
Win protege, was named Chairman of the BSPP and President of the
country. His appointment led to the beginning of a nationwide
revolt, with mass demonstrations in cities and towns throughout
Burma. In Rangoon, army troops fired on peaceful demonstrators
during the week of August 8-12 and killed substantial numbers,
but they were unable to quell the demonstrations. U Sein Lwin
resigned on August 12; his successor, Dr. Maung Maung, was
appointed by another extraordinary party congress of the BSPP
on August 19.
</p>
<p> Dr. Maung Maung was unable to halt popular opposition to the
BSPP government. By the middle of September, the BSPP virtually
ceased functioning, and many party members joined the millions
of demonstrators nationwide in demanding the immediate formation
of an interim government of respected non-BSPP figures, followed
by national multiparty elections. Though Dr. Maung Maung offered
a formula for multiparty elections and decreed that no
government employee could be a member of any political party,
he refused to step down in favor of an interim government. In
Rangoon, the collapse of civil authority led to a state of
anarchy in many neighborhoods, and instances of looting were
widespread.
</p>
<p> The army formally took over governmental authority on
September 18, deposing Maung Maung, abolishing the BSPP and the
civilian Councils of State, and imposing strict military rule
over the country. Large numbers of demonstrators were killed in
Rangoon, Mandalay, and other cities, and open opposition was
quelled through the use of brutal force. Several thousand
students fled the cities and concentrated in insurgent-held
areas near the Thai border, where they hoped to acquire arms and
training before returning to the cities to wage an urban
guerrilla campaign against the army.
</p>
<p> In taking power, the military pledged to hold multiparty
elections once law and order was reestablished and allowed the
formation of new political parties. Two principal parties
emerged: the National Unity Party, which was essentially the
BSPP under a new name, and the National League for Democracy,
led by the three leading opponents of the Ne Win-BSPP regime,
Tin U, Aung Gyi, and Aung San Suu Kyi. As of December 1988, the
military government had set no date for elections.
</p>
<p>Political Conditions
</p>
<p> With the military takeover of September 1988, the Burma
Socialist Program Party was formally abolished, and all
governing authority was concentrated in the hands of the
military. In announcing the takeover, Gen. Saw Maung stated that
military rule would be temporary and multiparty elections would
be held once law and order was reestablished. The Commission on
Elections, established by the Maung Maung government, shortly
afterward published rules permitting the registration of new
political parties. A trickle of new parties then applied for and
received official registration; by October, this trickle had
become a flood, and by December 1988, more than 150 parties were
officially in existence.
</p>
<p> Underlying this veneer of democracy, however, are the effects
of military rule. The large number of demonstrators killed in
the September takeover, arrest and imprisonment of persons
suspected of leading demonstrations, forced return to work of
striking workers, and summary dismissal of thousands of
government employees who had participated in demonstrations
contribute to an atmosphere of fear and intimidation. Leaders
of opposition parties have been able to campaign in various
parts of Burma but at times have had campaign activities
circumscribed by local military commands.
</p>
<p> Two principal parties emerged from the September takeover;
the National League for Democracy, led by several leading
opponents of the regime, is generally acknowledged as the
principal opposition party, while the National Union Party, make
up mostly of former Burma Socialist Program Party members, is
commonly viewed as a continuation of the BSPP.
</p>
<p> Uncertainty presently surround the regime's stated intention
to hold multiparty elections once law and order is
reestablished. As of December 1988, the military government has
not given a date for elections or indicated in general terms
when an election might be held.
</p>
<p> An additional unknown factor is U Ne Win. though technically
a private citizen, he is widely believed to retain a great deal
of personal power and may well have substantial influence among
the military leadership.
</p>
<p>Source: U.S. Department of State, Bureau of Public Affairs,
February 1989.
</p>
</body>
</article>
</text>